Too damn funny! I got a secret posted about the Pseudo Legacy in SimSecret while I was away. I almost forgot to check, so I could have very easily missed it.
Here it is for those who aren't really interested in wading through the silly junk that SimSecret usually is:

I don't actually recall ever saying those exact words. It's very possible I did, but I can't recall where I might have said that. I know I've said similar things, but I wish I could trace back that original comment.
To a certain degree, I can see the point here. Those comments taken out of context when put in comparison against the sims I'd chosen for my legacy heirs to marry could seem pretty hypocritical. Taylor was not face one, but he's got enough face one features to seem like he is. Christian and Matthew are both definitely face two, but there were different reasons for sticking with both of them. I'll admit that I am somewhat shallow about my sims looks. It's taken a while to get adventurous enough to experiment. But that's still never the point I was trying to make about 'shallow' authors.
The authors I was talking about are the ones that go on and on about the way the sims look and how hideous they are. There's a story over on boolprop that was decently popular I thought I'd give a try, but the author spent most of the first episode going on about how ugly Officer Dorian Kauker was. Dorian is face two! You're not going to get much more inoffensive than that.
Anyway, I'm rambling now. I'm really amused by this whole thing and not hurt by it at all. I do wonder who it was since they posted my LJ icon rather than my boolprop icon. Hmmm.
Here it is for those who aren't really interested in wading through the silly junk that SimSecret usually is:

I don't actually recall ever saying those exact words. It's very possible I did, but I can't recall where I might have said that. I know I've said similar things, but I wish I could trace back that original comment.
To a certain degree, I can see the point here. Those comments taken out of context when put in comparison against the sims I'd chosen for my legacy heirs to marry could seem pretty hypocritical. Taylor was not face one, but he's got enough face one features to seem like he is. Christian and Matthew are both definitely face two, but there were different reasons for sticking with both of them. I'll admit that I am somewhat shallow about my sims looks. It's taken a while to get adventurous enough to experiment. But that's still never the point I was trying to make about 'shallow' authors.
The authors I was talking about are the ones that go on and on about the way the sims look and how hideous they are. There's a story over on boolprop that was decently popular I thought I'd give a try, but the author spent most of the first episode going on about how ugly Officer Dorian Kauker was. Dorian is face two! You're not going to get much more inoffensive than that.
Anyway, I'm rambling now. I'm really amused by this whole thing and not hurt by it at all. I do wonder who it was since they posted my LJ icon rather than my boolprop icon. Hmmm.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 08:28 pm (UTC)Okay, seriously... I kind of laughed at that secret and forgot about it. Even if you did mean you don't like reading legacies where they only marry in the pretty faces, you married in Christian and Matthew for more than just the fact that they're pretty, so I don't see why it matters. I also noticed there was no mention of Shelby.
It was kind of funny to see a "Boolprop legacy" have a secret made about it though, haha. I never expected that to happen.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 08:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 08:34 pm (UTC)I just figured someone wanted to take a cheap shot!
And Dorian Kauker IS ugly, OMG, he's balding which is in no way fixable by Change Appearance.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 08:40 pm (UTC)Anyway, I'm glad you're not offended by that secret, Ori. It kind of made me mad, but if you don't mind it then I guess I won't say anything more about it. SimSecret just makes me annoyed as a rule, really. Don't these people have anything better to do than take potshots at each other?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 09:17 pm (UTC)"Hey, isn't that Taylor... And isn't that.. OMG!"
I honestly don't know why I keep looking at Sim Secret. It is mostly just a bunch of whining and wank, but I guess I like seeing the graphics people put together to display their silliness.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 08:43 pm (UTC)And shush your mouth about Dorian! Hrmph. He just needs a little rogaine. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 09:03 pm (UTC)I think that I remember that particular convo on boolprop. Found it!! I'm guessing that it's based on this quote from "How Do You Pick What NOT To Read" by you on 09/30/07:
"I think I may have already said this before, but I was reminded of it again today. I just can't really handle it when authors spend a great deal of time harping on looks. I just tried reading one where the founder had a child by a sim that had what I believe amounts to Face Two.. and the author was going on about hoping the kid's face didn't explode.
I'm not above marrying in pretty sims and I know I'm somewhat superficial, but at the same time when that's what it seems like the author is going on about all the time, I just... Ugh. The legacy may get really good, but if the author comes off initially as really superficial, I tend to give up fairly quickly."
I've come to the general conclusion that simsecret is mostly full of nutcases anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 09:19 pm (UTC)It is full of nutcases, but sometimes those nutcases do put together pretty or funny pictures. I think that's pretty much the only reason I still look at it - to see the pretty pictures.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 10:10 pm (UTC)Actually, I read the whole thing because I was at home (too much questionable content to read at work on breaks) and ended up commenting about the boolprop one, yours, and the one about photoshopping not being art.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 09:47 pm (UTC)Meh, the disadvantages of fame. At least it was a *bit* on-topic and not simply a flat out nasty attack, which many of the other "secrets" seem to be.
As for the one on Boolprop, well, I'm not a mod, so I guess I'm "nobody," but I thought that only meant I didn't have to mine through tons of crap to figure out what needed to be locked or warned about.
Same old, I guess.
PB
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 10:07 pm (UTC)It fails on many levels.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 02:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-19 11:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 12:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 12:18 am (UTC)Also, I think I know what legacy you're talking about - if it's the same one I'm thinking of, I've tried reading it a couple of times, but couldn't get past the first chapter for the same reason.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 01:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 01:49 am (UTC)I'm not totally sure why I read SimSecret at this point. Over time it's mostly all the same half dozen things over and over again. I think I may drop it from my read list, honestly.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 02:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 02:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 03:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-20 06:01 pm (UTC)As they say in show business, any press is good press! You're SimFamous! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-23 05:57 pm (UTC)I also noticed that they didn't mention about any of the spares. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 06:40 pm (UTC)Somebody should explain to that person how Shelby's face works. I mean, I've seen the effects and they were moderately pretty. It's really hot as an elder, though.
If it was me, she'd say I'm shallow because I gave plastic surgery to three of my sims. In all cases, it was to make them seem a bit similar to the personality I wrote for them.