Sim Secret Wank
Sep. 13th, 2008 02:31 amSo what's up with the wank jealousy someone is posting over at Sim Secret? It's getting rather silly, but someone seems determined to keep posting proof of our masturbatory tendencies.
WTF. I mean, really. I don't suffer idiots very graciously, but I think I'm a pretty friendly, open and helpful person on Boolprop. Did I do something to offend someone, or is someone just jealous at the perception of popularity?
Anyway.. It's getting silly. :)
WTF. I mean, really. I don't suffer idiots very graciously, but I think I'm a pretty friendly, open and helpful person on Boolprop. Did I do something to offend someone, or is someone just jealous at the perception of popularity?
Anyway.. It's getting silly. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 06:56 am (UTC)What they don't realize is that any bashing that's done on the 'famous' just brings the 'famous' more attention. With something like simsecret that's anonymous they can't even ride the tide and grab their own 5 seconds of fame by being known as the hater. All they can hope for is a reaction.
Don't feed the trolls :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:13 am (UTC)I guess Boolprop.com *might* seem clique-ish IF you were hypersensitive, but I don't think it really is. There are a lot of people who go out of their way to be welcoming to newcomers. It is true that once some people have started to notice a legacy, others start to as well. This could, if you really wanted to, be construed as some sort of popularity contest. But I've seen a lot of authors coming around in the last year or so who have become popular because frankly, their stuff is great.
I wonder if this is in any way related to the "I'm my only reader" thread? At its best, that ought to be some kind of "new legacy authors support thread." I miss the use of the actual review thread, too. It was nice to go through and occasionally find something cool and write a review.
I can't imagine that you did anything to offend anyone, other than being a nice, friendly moderator and writing a very popular story.
I must be getting hardened to this sort of criticism, because I'm starting to be amused at the idea of being in the outer circle of a gang of heartless Heathers :).
Oh, yes, Inner Cecil says:
"Hmph. Beneath contempt."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:19 am (UTC)I've been on Boolprop since 2006 and I've known most of you since you started your legacies, and I've seen that a) "famous" authors sure as hell do not get that way overnight and b) yeah, there's a group of us that happen to really enjoy each other's work. SO WHAT? It's not jerking off and it certainly doesn't mean anybody's leaving anyone else out. Goddammit.
I probably shouldn't be this annoyed. But it seriously makes me want to smack someone.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:19 am (UTC)It's just funny. Like the Sim Secret from last week that was ranting about the 'popular legacies'. Three of those legacies were Vetinari, Bohemian and Victorian. All three of those are relatively new and got readership because they're GOOD. Not because they're part of some inner circle. The rest of them, (mine, yours and Sarah's, I think) have been chugging along for close to two years now, eighteen months at the least. They've paid their dues.
I mean, if you go back to the beginning of my legacy thread, there are like two responses between updates at times. Thank god for Ben, he was wonderful encouragement back then. Marina too. But I started with no readers. YOU started with no readers. Everyone starts with no readers unless they've already 'published' something. It's just ludicrous to think that there's some sort of in-crowd of Heather-like Legacy Writers who decide who shall be successful and who shall not based on their whim.
Sure, success does carry some weight. When I discover a new legacy I enjoy (like Bohemian or more recently, Victorian) I hope my comments spur other people to start reading them too. But it's not like I'm bestowing them the honor of my attention or something insipid like that.
Grr.
Anyway, rant off. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:21 am (UTC)Part of me wishes I knew who was doing it, but ultimately it doesn't matter. It's just someone anonymously poking the 'popular kids' with a stick just to get attention.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:26 am (UTC)I guess the reason this amuses me, instead of annoying me, is because I've seen the same thing among academics. Grownups huddling in hotel lobbies whispering and saying "Did you SEE his luggage?" "Yeah! Who does he think he is?" and getting jealous of "famous" professors. And I always want to say, "Guys. GUYS. Outside of this hotel, nobody knows who the heck you are."
Also, some of the most famous people I've ever come in contact with were also the nicest. Not that I did anything more than carry his lunch one time, but Placido Domingo is nice as pie :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:46 am (UTC)I'm guessing some 12's jealous of the attention and decided to whine at the grown-ups' table. Whatever. I left that high school BS back in high school.
So far, it's more amusing than anything else. When it ceases to amuse... Well, cross that bridge when I come to it, I suppose.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 07:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 11:28 am (UTC)I will reiterate what everyone else is saying, though - it sounds like someone is jealous, because they feel like they're not included in a so-called "in crowd." Which is ridiculous, because I don't think boolprop is like that all. We like good legacy writing. We read and comment on the stories that are written well. End of story.
It's just that high school BS that we grew out of a long time ago (if I had done the kid thing when I was supposed to, they would be in high school now, too, so I figure we're about the same age).
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 01:44 pm (UTC)I got posted at the last one, 65. It doesn't make me furious, I actually laugh a bit... but it still really hurts me how someone would be shallow enough to say that. Ah well, stupid junk anyway... :\
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 01:59 pm (UTC)I think some members are just jealous of the fact that some stories and writers are more 'popular' than others. They forget that those stories didn't arrive on the scene popular and that the author has built up a fan base over time by writing damn good chapters. We all do this for fun, not to have our egos stroked, and if the secret makers aren't writing for this reason, maybe that's the problem. In fact the only wanker I can see in post 29 is the tosspot who wrote it.
Urgh sorry that came out a bit more ranty than I was expecting.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 04:02 pm (UTC)How many people are there on boolProp? It's a huge number! There's legacies with a billion jillion comments I've never read by people I have never interacted with. Why do people always go after the same 5 or 6 people?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 04:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 05:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 05:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 06:01 pm (UTC)Sim Secret's one of those things that at times I enjoy and other times I wonder why I'm bothering with it. I definitely don't like it when people get nasty which seems to be happening more often.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 06:03 pm (UTC)I do wonder if this person is one of those people who've posted on boolprop wanting to know how to make their legacy famous. I always get a little irritated when people post that type of thing 1. Being e-famous is not really that amazing of a thing and 2. we all do this as a hobby, not our life, and 3. we all started at exactly the same point - no readers at all.
Folks who get 'famous' have all gotten there because the stuff they're putting out is good and people enjoy it. It's not some secret clique no matter what that poster thinks.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 06:12 pm (UTC)I do think these are young, overly sensitive people making those secrets. And yes, they've got some good points, like you can't see a clique unless you're on the outside of it. But boolprop has always emphasized Play Nice. We try our hardest to NOT be exclusionary, so I don't see why they continue to whine.
Give 'em some nice Smoked Gouda and let 'em steam themselves silly.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 06:15 pm (UTC)We can celebrate middle age together. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 06:47 pm (UTC)Keep up the great work and ignore these immature kids that are really just super jealous. If they spent more time working on making their legacies better, they would build up and fan base and might become popular. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 09:02 pm (UTC)My usual response to that sort of nonsense is "I don't remember signing an agreement to stop having fun when I turned 18." I started playing computer games pretty much when there first was such a thing, I'm part of the reason why they're so common today, so to hell with anyone who doesn't understand.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 09:11 pm (UTC)Beyond that, though, I have no intentions of giving up anything that I currently enjoy, no matter what age limit people want to put on it. Video Games? Damn straight I'm going to keep playing them, and at least I'll be able to afford the screaming machine I want. Roleplaying games? Oh hell yes. And don't give me any flack for going to a gaming convention either. There's more of us middle-agers there all the time.
:)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 09:14 pm (UTC)The funny thing is, half the people they're accusing of being part of the 'clique' are people that I really didn't know that well several months ago. DocNerd, Jamie, and Dicreasy were all folks I've gotten to know within the last few months and I talk to because they're cool to talk to. That's it.
Mmm. Smoked Gouda...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 09:38 pm (UTC)Every time I feel down about getting older, I think "consider the alternative!"
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-14 02:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-14 03:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-14 07:52 am (UTC)While comments are enjoyable, I love my legacy no matter how many comments I get.
And the author of the secret makes it seem like there is a BoolProp Popularity Sector Seven; as if s/he would be banned if they commented.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-14 01:27 pm (UTC)I already have the feeling some Boolpropian will post a "secret" about me there saying I suck up to the mod/admin team (Queen Orikes, it's time for your foot massage | Jenn (Ndaiyne since you're the only one here) you are the awesome! :P) but I really don't care what people think. It's fun to be a suck up since you learn such interesting things about people.
Back when I joined Boolprop (the day before Bitsy BTW), I was one of the first underage members to join. We never had this kind of whining over legacies since everyone read everyone's legacy. Now with the newer (and a few of them younger) members, this has happened a lot. I'm not saying that it's the youngest members who do this but the maturity level there has gone down quite a bit. This really is a sad site to see when members insults each other and the team...kick some butt Orikes :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 04:56 am (UTC)Um, what?
Date: 2008-09-15 10:05 am (UTC)Can you tell me who you are, please? I'm not angry, I just want to know who thinks I wrote that -- I thought it was similar to the way I write, but I didn't. I don't have the time to read many legacies, so I wouldn't bother doing it if it was by a "nobody". (BTW, this doesn't mean I think Mike is a nobody, it means that I wouldn't read it if I thought he was a nobody.)
Re: Um, what?
Date: 2008-09-15 10:07 am (UTC)